|
independents react well to a conspicuous display of reasonableness.
|
|
07-29-2011, 10:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
independents react well to a conspicuous display of reasonableness.
Quote:There's a fair amount of armchair psychoanalyzing here, but Bruce Bartlett has an interesting theory today about why President Obama continually thinks that pre-emptive compromise will bring Republicans to the table: it's because he never had the pleasure of negotiating with either the Soviet Union or Big Labor, a pair of opponents who could very quickly disabuse presidents of the idea that nice guys finish first: Quote:My biggest objection, though, is that I'm not sure it would have mattered. If Obama had negotiated with nerves of steel, would he have gotten better deals throughout his presidency? I don't think so. Unlike labor bosses and Soviet bosses, who could be pressured because there were things they wanted that a president could provide, Republicans β and especially tea party Republicans β want nothing that Obama can feasibly give them. If Obama had been tough as nails, they would have followed a path of total obstruction and nihilism anyway. Maybe some details here and there would have changed, but on the whole it just wouldn't have made any difference. http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2011/0...-such-wimp βAny fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do.β Benjamin Franklin |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
|
Messages In This Thread
|
|
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)







![[*]](images/twilight/ndxdragns.gif)


![[Image: haironfire.jpg]](http://d21c.com/SassyYank/dc_5/haironfire.jpg)


![[Image: sendTheSeals.jpg]](http://bobcesca.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/sendTheSeals.jpg)