Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
When you're at war you don't have to wait until the other side grabs his gun
05-05-2011, 01:16 PM
Post: #1
When you're at war you don't have to wait until the other side grabs his gun
International law does not require soldiers to honor the other side's requests for time outs to they can reload or get more ammo or even to get their gun. You're at war you are allowed to shoot first. OBL declared war on America

Quote:The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies -- civilians and military -- is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque and the holy mosque [Mecca] from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty God, "and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together," and "fight them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God."


http://www.pbs.org/newshour/terrorism/in..._1998.html

“Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do.”

Benjamin Franklin
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top

Post Reply 
Messages In This Thread
[*]
05-05-2011, 02:12 PM
Post: #2
RE: When you're at war you don't have to wait until the other side grabs his gun
Thank you! I knew what this was about when I saw the caption on the front page..who's whining about bin laden not being armed, mullah omar?

"Democracy Is Not A Spectator Sport. The Future Is Ours If We Actively Participate In Shaping It" Flag
John Harder~http://zerowastekauai.org/index.html
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top
05-05-2011, 02:14 PM
Post: #3
RE: When you're at war you don't have to wait until the other side grabs his gun
I'm sorta tuning out the bin Laden blather out in the world.

Are people (other than bin Laden sympathizers) actually trying to criticize the operation because bin Laden was unarmed?

My understanding, based on one of the stories I have read which of course could change any day now, is that the soldiers had orders to accept surrender if offered and to use deadly force if necessary. It was apparently not offered, and people were shooting at them. I'm not going to second-guess that for even a millisecond. This is clearly in keeping with the laws of war and even some law enforcement situations.

Is there a real complaint here, or just some attempt to make shit up?

“The first thing I do in the morning is brush my teeth and sharpen my tongue.” -- Dorothy Parker
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top
05-05-2011, 05:04 PM
Post: #4
RE: When you're at war you don't have to wait until the other side grabs his gun
OBL was an enemy combatant, and got every consideration as such.

Now he's dead.

End of story, all the rest of the bullshit is hand-wringing by those that hate this president, end of story.

They use anything to keep score of some sort of political points kept on an imaginary scoreboard in their pointy heads.

[Image: DFP_logo.PNG] "This Is A Big Fuckin' Deal."
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top

Post Reply 

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)