Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Six Ways Fukushima is Not Chernobyl
03-18-2011, 12:30 PM
Post: #1
Six Ways Fukushima is Not Chernobyl
The crisis at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi has already been dubbed the worst nuclear accident since Chernobyl, and the situation there continues to worsen.

But along with references to the "ch-word," as one nonproliferation expert put it [1], experts have been quick to provide reasons why the Daiichi crisis will not be "the next Chernobyl."

Experts have noted several key differences in the design of the reactors in question, as well as in the government's reaction to the crisis:

--snip--

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com...hp?ref=fpb
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top

Post Reply 
Messages In This Thread
Six Ways Fukushima is Not Chernobyl #1 - Beetwasher - 03-18-2011, 12:30 PM
z-Thumbsup Thx for the link. #2 - yowzayowzayowza - 03-18-2011, 03:35 PM
[*]
03-18-2011, 03:35 PM
Post: #2
z-Thumbsup Thx for the link.
Even if this ends up with a festering pile or two, twill be far short of Chernobyl.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top
03-18-2011, 04:39 PM
Post: #3
RE: Six Ways Fukushima is Not Chernobyl
Chernobyl was designed much earlier, I'm assuming. And it was in the USSR, which wasn't famous for running things well.

"Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek." Barack Obama

Is féidir linn.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top

Post Reply 

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)