Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
EPA scientist who warned of caustic dust from Ground Zero wins job back
05-08-2012, 08:30 AM
Post: #1
EPA scientist who warned of caustic dust from Ground Zero wins job back
Quote:A government scientist sacked for exposing the dangers to firefighters from the caustic air at Ground Zero in the days after 9/11 got her job back on Monday.

A federal court ordered that Cate Jenkins, a chemist at the Environmental Protection Agency, be reinstated to her job with back pay.

Her lawyer said the decision, although based on matters of legal process, amounted to vindication for Jenkins’s claims that the EPA had covered up the danger posed to first responders and others in lower Manhattan from the asbestos and highly corrosive dust that rose from the wreckage of the World Trade Center.

It was also a rare victory for whistleblowers, said lawyer Paula Dinerstein. “This doesn’t happen that often.”

Jenkins, who has spent more than 30 years at the EPA, was the first agency official to warn of the dangers of the caustic dust rising from the ruins of the World Trade Center.

The dust, which had dangerously high Ph levels, was so corrosive it caused chemical burns to the lungs of firefighters and other rescue teams. Hundreds of workers spent weeks at the scene without protective gear such as respirators.

Subsequent research has shown as many as two-thirds suffered permanent lung damage.

Medical experts now believe much of the health effects could have been prevented if workers were issued proper safety gear.

At the time, however, Christine Todd Whitman, then head of the EPA, claimed there were no readings to indicate a health hazard. Whitman has since said the Bush administration did not want to cause panic.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/05/07/ep...-job-back/


Why isn't someone on trial for negligence for exposing these rescue workers and firefighters to toxic chemicals when it could easily have been avoided with the use of respirators?
And what the hell is this "didn't want to cause panic" bullshit that always seemed to come from the Bush administration? They certainly did plenty of crap to cause panic and weren't afraid to use the color codes to drum up some panic whenever it suited their purposes.

"I give thanks for this perfect day. Miracle will follow miracle and wonders will never cease."

The universe tends to unfold as it should.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top

Post Reply 
Messages In This Thread
[*]
05-08-2012, 09:03 AM
Post: #2
RE: EPA scientist who warned of caustic dust from Ground Zero wins job back
You were only supposed to look at the pictures of ground zero and be afraid. The workers were on their own until the bill passed to help them with medical problems in 2010. I'm glad the woman got her job back....with back pay!

[Image: haironfire.jpg]
The GOP conspiracies
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top
05-08-2012, 09:40 AM
Post: #3
RE: EPA scientist who warned of caustic dust from Ground Zero wins job back
(05-08-2012 08:30 AM)azmouse Wrote:  
Quote:A government scientist sacked for exposing the dangers to firefighters from the caustic air at Ground Zero in the days after 9/11 got her job back on Monday.

A federal court ordered that Cate Jenkins, a chemist at the Environmental Protection Agency, be reinstated to her job with back pay.

Her lawyer said the decision, although based on matters of legal process, amounted to vindication for Jenkins’s claims that the EPA had covered up the danger posed to first responders and others in lower Manhattan from the asbestos and highly corrosive dust that rose from the wreckage of the World Trade Center.

It was also a rare victory for whistleblowers, said lawyer Paula Dinerstein. “This doesn’t happen that often.”

Jenkins, who has spent more than 30 years at the EPA, was the first agency official to warn of the dangers of the caustic dust rising from the ruins of the World Trade Center.

The dust, which had dangerously high Ph levels, was so corrosive it caused chemical burns to the lungs of firefighters and other rescue teams. Hundreds of workers spent weeks at the scene without protective gear such as respirators.

Subsequent research has shown as many as two-thirds suffered permanent lung damage.

Medical experts now believe much of the health effects could have been prevented if workers were issued proper safety gear.

At the time, however, Christine Todd Whitman, then head of the EPA, claimed there were no readings to indicate a health hazard. Whitman has since said the Bush administration did not want to cause panic.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/05/07/ep...-job-back/


Why isn't someone on trial for negligence for exposing these rescue workers and firefighters to toxic chemicals when it could easily have been avoided with the use of respirators?
And what the hell is this "didn't want to cause panic" bullshit that always seemed to come from the Bush administration? They certainly did plenty of crap to cause panic and weren't afraid to use the color codes to drum up some panic whenever it suited their purposes.

Their statement needs to be expanded, "They didn't want to create a panic unless there was a political advantage to doing so!"

"In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." --George Orwell
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top

Post Reply 

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)