Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Now companies are blaming potential workers for not enough skills
10-26-2011, 09:56 AM (This post was last modified: 10-26-2011 10:03 AM by TheNewMe.)
Post: #1
Now companies are blaming potential workers for not enough skills
I've seen several articles on that topic lately.

Here is a response to that:

Quote:Why Companies Aren't Getting the Employees They Need
The conventional wisdom is that our education system is failing our economy. But our companies deserve a lot of the blame themselves.
By PETER CAPPELLI
Wall Street Journal
...
Even with unemployment hovering around 9%, companies are grousing that they can't find skilled workers, and filling a job can take months of hunting.
...
With an abundance of workers to choose from, employers are demanding more of job candidates than ever before. They want prospective workers to be able to fill a role right away, without any training or ramp-up time.
...
Some of the complaints about skill shortages boil down to the fact that employers can't get candidates to accept jobs at the wages offered. That's an affordability problem, not a skill shortage. A real shortage means not being able to find appropriate candidates at market-clearing wages. We wouldn't say there is a shortage of diamonds when they are incredibly expensive; we can buy all we want at the prevailing prices.
...
Here are three ways in which employees can get the skills they need without the employer having to invest in a lot of upfront training....[titles of next three sections:]
- Work with education providers
- Bring back aspects of apprenticeship
- Promote from within
...
Comments on this article also seen on reddit

A few years ago when the economy started going, the previous company I worked for noticed layoffs at other companies in their industry. They thought they could get good highly technical people for cheap wages. So they wrote up a job description demanding more skills than the job actually needed, requiring someone with a phd in a specific technical discipline, for a salary $20-$30k less than people in the current position were making who had bachelors or masters degrees. Plus, it was a geographic location no one would want to move to.

We laughed and laughed. roflmao If a company is laying off, the last thing they would do is lay off people in a hard-to-find technical discipline. Plus, the technical person would have their pick of jobs elsewhere, and with a pay raise.

That was probably the most fun we had at that job - being amused by the illogical thought patterns of the higher-ups. Chuckle You couldn't tell them otherwise.

A couple months ago, my previous co-worker called because her manager wanted to know if I wanted to come back to that job. Apparently they hadn't hired anybody. Happy21


Oh, I just noticed... Given the Occupy Wall Street movement lately, will I get points off for quoting the Wall Street Journal?Wink

Cool
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply Return to top

Post Reply 
Messages In This Thread
[*]

Post Reply 

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)