|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-17-2012, 12:24 PM
|
|
jaxx
Moderator
   
|
Posts: 18,545
Joined: Dec 2010
|
|
RE: Adelson To Fork Up $10M More For Gingrich
Gingrich Patron Set to Donate Another $10 Million
The donation may help Newt inject himself back into what has increasingly become a two-man race between Santorum and Romney.
By Ankita Rao and Josh Voorhees | Posted Friday, Feb. 17, 2012, at 10:29 AM ET
<..> CNN's sources say that the eight-figure donation will come before the end of the month, while CBS's suggest that it could happen within days. Adelson had previously suggested that his further financial support of Gingrich was in doubt, and signaled that he'd be ready and willing to back Romney if the time came.
The Wall Street Journal, which reported earlier this week that Adelson was considering cutting another check, suggests that the billionaire's goal is to derail Rick Santorum's campaign as much as it is to help Gingrich's. Adelson is reportedly concerned about some of Santorum's deeply conservative social views, such as his strong anti-abortion stance, and is worried that he wouldn't be able to compete with President Obama in a general election showdown.
http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2012/02/1...er_slatest
Interesting that Santorum's far out religious views are too much for the Gingrich supporter.
![[Image: haironfire.jpg]](http://d21c.com/SassyYank/dc_5/haironfire.jpg)
The GOP conspiracies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-17-2012, 02:13 PM
|
|
Andy823
Member
 
|
Posts: 906
Joined: Dec 2010
|
|
RE: Adelson To Fork Up $10M More For Gingrich
(02-17-2012 12:30 PM)janedrake Wrote: With all these billionaires throwing tens of millions of dollars at GOP candidates, it brings into sharp relief the FACT that they won't miss a meal or go broke if they are made to pay a 30% tax rate on capital gains. With each check they write to Gingrich, Santorum and Romney, they give the country written proof they can well afford to pay the same tax rates as the rest of us.
Yes, the idea that taxing them at higher rates will somehow "hurt" them, or stop them from "creating jobs", is pure BS. These guys spend money like it's nothing will millions here in the US are out of work, on unemployment, or barely making ends meet working for minimum wage. These people don't care about anything but control the congress so they can get what they want, when they want it, and that needs to change.
As Peacetrain staid, I too hope the people get so mad about this that they demand congress put a stop to it! If we can vote a bunch of the tea party clowns out this year, along with a some of the republicans that have been blocking everything in the House, maybe we can do something about it. If members of congress see those who have been supporting this idea that the rich can "buy" congress, maybe they will wake up and do what is right, at least for fear they too will be voted out in their next election.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-17-2012, 02:21 PM
|
|
Andy823
Member
 
|
Posts: 906
Joined: Dec 2010
|
|
RE: Adelson To Fork Up $10M More For Gingrich
(02-17-2012 01:21 PM)jaxx Wrote: Wait till they have a nominee and they all throw their $$$ behind him. President Obama is going to need big money to hold his own against them. I bet they're making the ads already.
Yes once they have a nominee, there will be a lot of money coming their way to defeat the president, but I think that the american people are not happy with their government being bought by the highest bidders. I have heard a lot of republicans who are not happy about all the money that is now allowed to be spent in elections.
Even republicans are afraid of who they will get simply because they had the most money. I remember at least on state, can't remember which one, out west that passed a law putting stop to the big money coming to their state to elect state and local leaders. Now granted some of those republicans who are against it might only be worried about democrats getting elected, but if enough people in the country on both sides of the political spectrum get mad enough something may bet done to stop it.
One thing for sure, we do NOT need anymore republicans on the Supreme Court who will pass this kind of insane ruling.
|
|
|
|
|
02-18-2012, 06:54 AM
|
|
DFW
Member
 
|
Posts: 849
Joined: Dec 2010
|
|
|
RE: Adelson To Fork Up $10M More For Gingrich
The Supreme Court is, like last time, one of the most important unspoken issues in this election.
It's almost sure that Ruth Bader-Ginsburg will have to retire sometime in the next four years. We need Obama to nominate her replacement just to maintain the four seats we do have. It's possible that Kennedy and Scalia will hold out beyond 2016, but Scalia has bad eating habits (check his girth) and Kennedy will be 80 in 2016. This doesn't mean either will retire, of course. Meanness seems to be a sustaining trait into longevity (Strom Thurmond was a 100 year old Senator, don't forget).
"Believe those who seek the truth. Doubt those who find it."--André Gide
|
|
|
|
|
|